Regarding the recall in Japan, I found this
https://japaninspection.org/vehicle-recall-verification and this
https://www.mlit.go.jp/en/jidosha/index.htmlI was surprised that the brake simulator issue is not listed, so I went back to the original website addressing it
https://www.honda.co.jp/recall/auto/info/231208_683.html?fbclid=IwAR3cv03bAX-1RKirwgKYSeq-7FFvU2ViGMjQ_9fZdezR5K-HzNc6C38cmZ4Looking at it again, this is listed as "Improvement Measures Notification Number: 683" and not "Recall notification number: xxxx". Looking at
https://www.honda.co.jp/recall/ (the auto-translation is a bit confusing) I think a recall applies if there's non-compliance or a risk of non-compliance with safety standards by design/manufacture and improvement measures apply if the vehicle complies with safety standards, but there is a risk of non-compliance over time. This appears to be different from the UK DVSA system.
Having established that there is not a formal regulatory safety recall in Japan and unlikely to be a UK one, I thought I'd look at it from a different perspective. Starting with the number of eHEV Jazz cars, from
https://www.howmanyleft.co.uk/?q=honda+jazz+i-mmd there were about 36,000 pre-facelift models registered between 2020 and 2024 (20,000 in 2020/21).
According to the Japanese report, Jazz/Fit models affected were manufactured between mid 2018 and early 2022. I think it's reasonable to assume that Honda record which batches of component parts go into their cars and they use "just-in-time" production methods. So, as the UK sales started in the first quarter of 2020, it is likely that the majority of brake simulators from the faulty batches were incorporated into non-UK cars and that there would be a diminishing number of parts from the faulty batches likely to be put in UK cars. It may also be the case that not all parts in the batches were incorrectly assembled.
From Honda's perspective, recalling 20,000 pre-facelift Jazz cars to replace the brake simulator in each one could cost £40 million (at, say £2K per car). Having already established that this issue is unlikely to meet the DVSA criteria for a "serious safety defect", for Honda a voluntary recall of all cars may be seen as unnecessary and financially prohibitive.
Forum and Facebook posts report around a dozen failures of the brake simulator. There will be others, but Honda may have information to suggest that only a limited number of cars may include an incorrectly assembled part from the identified batches. So for this exercise, say there are 100 actual and potential failures out there. Assuming Honda will want to maintain their reputation for reliability and customer satisfaction, if they were to address each failure as it is reported and change the brake simulator at no cost to the owner. At £2k each, this might cost Honda £200K - likely to be much more acceptable to the business even for 200/300 instances.
From a user's perspective though, the whole point of the brake simulator is to mimic the resistance of a conventional servo-assisted hydraulic system. As Spodric has just noted not having this familiar "feel" may in itself be a hazardous condition if nothing appears to be happening until the pedal hits the floor.