The display gives figures for mpg in floating point to a tenth of an mpg, eg 60.7, 60.8, 60.9 mpg, this implies the measurement of fuel used and distance travelled is accurately measured to less than 1% error of both variables,
I do not believe the measurement of fuel consumed and distance travelled is so precise and accurately measured we can trust the figure to a tenth of an mpg, I believe even quoting mpg in integers such as59, 60 or 61 mpg is beyond the capacity of the measuring system, probably rounding to figures in increments of 5 mpg , 55, 60, 65 are more credible for the measuring system