Thanks for the quick reply! I really appreciate it.
I've indeed read that a Honda can go for many, many miles. But it doesn't feel right to pay 5000€ for a car with that kind of mileage. Isn't such car more prone to expensive maintenance costs? What's your experience and how many miles have you added to the Jazz? Have you had many costs?
On the other hand: the 2004 Jazz has only driven 46k miles in the past 9 years and the car was mainly used on the country side... I've heard that this can also be very hard on a car. Chances are that the 90k miles 2006 Jazz has seen a lot of motorway-speeds.
You're welcome, I'm glad I could be of help!
The jazz actually belongs to the missus, obviously we've had it for just over a month and have covered only 1000 miles, so it may be too soon to tell in regards to 'reliability' - I did change the battery as a precaution as I was noticing slow starts occasionally. I personally drive a Toyota Prius which I bought at 3 years old with 80k on the clock for certainly a lot more than 5000 euros! It's now just over 100k and I haven't had to spend a single penny on it other than yearly servicing and one set of wiper blades.
Prior to the Jazz we had a 99 Polo which was bought 10 years old and had 'only' 45k. We had this for just over three years and 15k miles, it was in and out of the mechanic's for one problem or another, eventually we got £150 from the scrap yard for it!
In essence, I guess it depends on the actual car you buy, there'll be lots of people saying go for lower mileage and an equal number saying go for the newer car, you should decide which one you think is better and more suited to you. In this case, I recommended the 2006 because it was from Honda hence 'approved used' and has the warranty, whilst the 2004 already has an ABS fault and was overpriced in my opinion. Since you're only going to be doing 6k a year, mileage wouldn't matter too much in the long run should you choose to sell the car.
Let us know how you get on!