Having said that, I guess the petrol engine would only be idling so I may be overthinking this!
Thanks for the replies which all make sound sense. I can see that, if heat is required, the engine will need to be on. One thing that has occurred to me is observing Toyota Hybrids. The new range claim that they can (as opposed to will) run for up to 4 miles in pure EV mode and can reach 70 mph.If you just want heat then the heated seats are an alternative to using climate
There are a lot of Toyotas near me as the main dealer is only 5 minutes away. The Hybrids do seem to operate in EV mode automatically when moving from a standing start. Have they all got the climate control off? Is it possible to use residual heat rather than turning the engine on. My feeling is that, if I bought a Mk4 Jazz, the engine would rarely be off except, say, when the ambient temperature is higher than the setting chosen.
Having said that, I guess the petrol engine would only be idling so I may be overthinking this!
My feeling is that, if I bought a Mk4 Jazz, the engine would rarely be off except, say, when the ambient temperature is higher than the setting chosen.Sunlight warms the car well above the ambient air temperature. I needed air-conditioning in my Mk3 in yesterday's sunshine although the air temperature was only around 14 C. I rarely need heat in East Anglia between April and September, but I suppose it depends on where you live.
It is the air conditioning that is really the question here, is it (compressor) driven solely by the generator/engine or can it be driven by the EV battery? If only driven by the engine/generator then in the summer the engine will be running most of the time to cool the cabin. I would think that the compressor is driven by the EV battery then the engine will only fire up when the battery is exhausted by the electric motor driving the wheels and/or the compressor. Really need a definitive answer from a Honda technical expert?My feeling is that, if I bought a Mk4 Jazz, the engine would rarely be off except, say, when the ambient temperature is higher than the setting chosen.Sunlight warms the car well above the ambient air temperature. I needed air-conditioning in my Mk3 in yesterday's sunshine although the air temperature was only around 14 C. I rarely need heat in East Anglia between April and September, but I suppose it depends on where you live.
The Aircon is driven by one of the batteries, the engine is used to charge up the EV battery when the power level is low. The 12v battery is charged from the EV battery, not the engine.It is the air conditioning that is really the question here, is it (compressor) driven solely by the generator/engine or can it be driven by the EV battery? If only driven by the engine/generator then in the summer the engine will be running most of the time to cool the cabin. I would think that the compressor is driven by the EV battery then the engine will only fire up when the battery is exhausted by the electric motor driving the wheels and/or the compressor. Really need a definitive answer from a Honda technical expert?My feeling is that, if I bought a Mk4 Jazz, the engine would rarely be off except, say, when the ambient temperature is higher than the setting chosen.Sunlight warms the car well above the ambient air temperature. I needed air-conditioning in my Mk3 in yesterday's sunshine although the air temperature was only around 14 C. I rarely need heat in East Anglia between April and September, but I suppose it depends on where you live.
Just watched a You Tube video of a chap in the Czech Republic test driving a Cross Star in Prague. I know we've covered this before but the tester said that you need to turn the climate control off if you want the car to run in EV mode. If the climate control is on the petrol engine is on (although not necessarily powering the car directly).The aim of an hybrid powertrain like Jazz or Toyotas isn't to run the most of the time in EV: i-MMD and HSD are used to keep the petrol engine running in the best conditions or to stay off, that's why the power battery is very small. Who wants to drive in EV mode should buy an EV or a plug-in hybrid.
Is this the case? I'm someone who likes to set Climate Control up to my requirements and then leave it to do its job but if this means the petrol engine is always ticking over I don't think I would be tempted by the Mk4.
The aim of an hybrid powertrain like Jazz or Toyotas isn't to run the most of the time in EV: i-MMD and HSD are used to keep the petrol engine running in the best conditions or to stay off, tha's why the power battery is very small. Who wants to drive in EV mode should buy an EV or a plug-in hybrid.Exactly.
You have a point but the question asked was simply whether the A/C runs off the battery or the generator. If the generator then A/C needs engine running to work, if battery then A/C will work without engine running until battery needs recharging. Nothing to do with EV use at all. EV's and plug ins are great if you've got somewhere to charge them and the money to buy them in the first place. Not to mention range anxiety!!The climate control will work off the battery only providing sufficient power in the battery (ie > approx 30%), I can confirm as I've done it in my Crosstar
You have a point but the question asked was simply whether the A/C runs off the battery or the generator.
Okay, you are right. However these threads always develop so hopefully we have answered both points.You have a point but the question asked was simply whether the A/C runs off the battery or the generator.
Actually, no! Read the original post. It seems as if the OP would be put off a hybrid because the engine might be ticking over to keep the aircon running. I think this worry shows a misunderstanding of the role of hybrids. They are not battery electric vehicles and will therefore have the engine running as needed. So I think the point about the difference between the types of vehicles is relevant.
My last fillup was better:
(https://i.imgur.com/FeD1R9L.jpg)
As I answered before, what you suggest would be nice but very expensive, it would mean to deeply change the aircon-heating system of the car. The heating mode of the heat pump (remember that the traditional aircon is still a heat pump, even if a single mode) would be added to the standard liquid heater, I don't know if people would be happy to pay 500-1000$ or more for this feature, to be used only in particular moments.
Providing winter heat is less efficient as once the battery is full then the load on the engine becomes minimal but the best way to get the engine warm is to apply some load. Those heated seats provide some electrical load and I would have included an electrical heating element in the windscreen demister vent to help provide hot air for clearning the windscreen. As I've said several times previously, I would have designed the aircon to run backwards as a heat pump to avoid the problem of cabin heating making it more difficult for the engine to reach optimum temperature under light usage (eg urban traffic).
Some excellent points made above and I get the point about not fully understanding how the hybrid system is meant to work. That said I think there is an issue with air pollution especially in built up areas like where I live. I quite like the stop start system (even allowing for it being somewhat temperamental) which reduces pollution when stopped, at say, traffic lights. The boon of a hybrid, as I understand it, is that it almost always cuts the engine at a stop and then moves off in pure EV mode even if only for a short distance. That's how all the Prius taxis that I have used seem to work. I wouldn't be happy with the engine idling at traffic lights - it would annoy the hell out of me.If you have the climate control on all the time on an EV it can significantly reduce the range so there's still a price to be paid, it is rare for the engine to be running when stationary on the Jazz but it does happen occasionally
I've got over 18 months before I need to decide. I am hoping that a suitable EV will be available then.
How very true, a friend has a Jag i-Pace and he gets nowhere near the quoted 250 mile range in summer. He reckons nearer to 150.
How very true, a friend has a Jag i-Pace and he gets nowhere near the quoted 250 mile range in summer. He reckons nearer to 150.If the UK is to be successful in banning new ICE vehicles from 2030, we will need major progress in EV range and rapid recharging widely available. My car is parked 30 yards away from my home, so home charging is impossible, as it is for many others. If I’m still allowed to drive I think I’ll buy a hybrid in 2029!
How is anyone going to tow a caravan?By keeping an old gas-guzzling filth-producing diesel until anything non-EV has been banned from the roads. It might then be necessary to exploit a loophole by having a vintage diesel vehicle.
That's exactly what I think. But what is it going to do to the caravan building industry? Employs thousands in UK and without any assurances on towing vehicles potential buyers are going to be put off. So a few more thousand jobs sacrificed on the altar of virtue signalling by government.How is anyone going to tow a caravan?By keeping an old gas-guzzling filth-producing diesel until anything non-EV has been banned from the roads. It might then be necessary to exploit a loophole by having a vintage diesel vehicle.
How is anyone going to tow a caravan, stop every 100 miles to re-charge?
You wonder just how much thought went into the decision to adopt 2030 as a cut off date.
How is anyone going to tow a caravan, stop every 100 miles to re-charge?
You wonder just how much thought went into the decision to adopt 2030 as a cut off date.
One gallon of petrol has over 25 kilowatt hours of energy, that is as much as an original Nissan Leaf battery - added to that both solar and wind are very weak energy streams that need an awful lot of equipment to extract meaningful amounts of energy.I think it’s more like 45 kWh per gallon of petrol, so using 45 mpg as a typical consumption, this means 1 mile/kWh. However, there are a lot of thermal losses in an ICE, so 3-4 miles/kWh is realistic for an EV. I think 2 watts/sq m, or 2MW per sq km, is a realistic norm for a wind farm (assuming the wind is blowing!).
I'm running with the Climate Control permanently On, set to 20c, and can confirm that the EV mode does work for a significant amount of time, Only had the car for 3 days and about 35 miles covered, current average consumption of 63.7Mpg. local motoring. I will be doing my first long distance run on Saturday circa 250 miles and will report back.
I think I saw an article recently on the Tesla EV, which claimed a difference in range of only 5 miles with and without Climate Control, so if that is case here, then I'm not concerned.That is born out by jazzaro's link to Peugeot
Thanks for the information. I would be most interested what MPG you achieve on that journey if you increased your speed on motorways to 70’ish - because that’s the speed I drive on motorways! Any idea when you are making the same journey again so you can do a direct comparison between 60 and 70 on motorway driving?I'm running with the Climate Control permanently On, set to 20c, and can confirm that the EV mode does work for a significant amount of time, Only had the car for 3 days and about 35 miles covered, current average consumption of 63.7Mpg. local motoring. I will be doing my first long distance run on Saturday circa 250 miles and will report back.
Did my first long distance trip today, taking in M42/M1/M18/M180, plus a few miles of local roads, making a total of 335 miles since delivery. Speed on the motorways was kept at 60 Mph using ACC
Climate control set as previously stated.
I can confirm that EV mode did work for many miles (perhaps a mile or so each time, but not really sure how many) and returned 66.8 MPG over the 335 miles total, with 315 miles remaining as per attached photo
Might be some weeks before I do the same trip again, but will let you know when I do.Thought so, I've always felt it better to run new cars in a bit as well and I'm of that vintage when it was considered essential!
My only reason for 60mph was, as an old school driver, was to run it in a bit.
I know it’s not supposed to necessary nowadays, but I still think it makes a difference.
Thanks for the information. I would be most interested what MPG you achieve on that journey if you increased your speed on motorways to 70’ish - because that’s the speed I drive on motorways! Any idea when you are making the same journey again so you can do a direct comparison between 60 and 70 on motorway driving?You can figure this out by looking at the components of the WLTP test cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldwide_Harmonised_Light_Vehicles_Test_Procedure. The extra high phase is representative of cruising at up to 80mph and the results (see attached extract from Jazz Mk 4 brochures with columns the 4 grades of Jazz) show that the fuel economy falls through the floor at the motorway speed limit.
I can see that but I would rather have real world figures to compare against. Wouldn’t you?Thanks for the information. I would be most interested what MPG you achieve on that journey if you increased your speed on motorways to 70’ish - because that’s the speed I drive on motorways! Any idea when you are making the same journey again so you can do a direct comparison between 60 and 70 on motorway driving?You can figure this out by looking at the components of the WLTP test cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldwide_Harmonised_Light_Vehicles_Test_Procedure. The extra high phase is representative of cruising at up to 80mph and the results (see attached extract from Jazz Mk 4 brochures with columns the 4 grades of Jazz) show that the fuel economy falls through the floor at the motorway speed limit.
Drag losses are roughly proportional to speed squared and the Jazz, being relatively short and high, has a higher drag factor than cars which are more streamlined. At 60mph or over the hybrid system brings minimal fuel economy benefit although the Atkinson cycle engine helps a bit. However, when there's a problem and the motorway traffic changes to stop-start-crawl mode then the hybrid system provides a very obvious benefit.
I can see that but I would rather have real world figures to compare against. Wouldn’t you?Yes, but the real world figures can be distorted by real world factors, particularly the wind and temperature. For example, yesterday I did a round trip 46 miles each way, 94 minutes outbound and 84 minutes return and the car reported 77.8 mpg for the outbound leg and 70.8 mpg for the return. The difference, is I think, largely due to a tailwind going out and a headwind on the way home.
When Which? had a MK4 on test they were getting 91mpg but I don't know exactly what their test routes were.There will be millions of ICE vehicles on UK roads after 2030, and for many years after that. Drivers regularly doing long journeys for which EV's are unsuitable, second hand car drivers who can't afford an EV or have the space to charge it, first time young country drivers who need a car to get round but can't afford anything newish, cars towing caravans, not to mention trucks etc. The change to full EV ownership will take years, if ever.
The one thing that keeps popping up is, even if we keep a hybrid long after 2030, will the oil companies still supply the UK when other countries will be more profitable until/if they ban fuel.
Petrol and diesel will remain easily available because demand will be there.
What about the coal in your bathtub?Petrol and diesel will remain easily available because demand will be there.
Even if a ban on gasoline is announced, we will have no problem. Our hybrids use so little of it that when we fill our bathtub at home, we can keep driving for years and years, right? (https://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/midi/froehlich/a068.gif)
When Which? had a MK4 on test they were getting 91mpg but I don't know exactly what their test routes were.
There's a description of the testing at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/new-and-used-cars/article/how-we-test/how-we-test-mpg-and-emissions-amm4w1M5ytlb.When Which? had a MK4 on test they were getting 91mpg but I don't know exactly what their test routes were.The report states that the jazz should post average fuel economy of 62.8mpg. They couldn't match this, achieving 55.4mpg in independent tests. If you drive mostly in town, they achieved 91.1mpg in urban testing.