Not sure I understand all the techie stuff here, all I can say is that the lights seem to be perfectly adequate. If that suggests that Honda have opted to take a step back from the escalating "arms race" of fitting ever-brighter lights and have simply fitted something that works, then I'm all for it.
Look at a Renault Clio headlights (but it's the same for a Opel, pardon, Vauxall Corsa, a VW Polo or others...)
You will see two projectors, each with its own lamp. There is a 55W halogen lamp for dipped beam (focused and another 55W lamp for high beam. Dipped beam aim to illuminate the 15meters in front of the car and both sides without glaring, high beam aim to illuminate only the road in the front of the car. Jazz has only one projector and one 55W lamp for both dipped/high beam, and you can use only one mode: if you use the high beam, you must give up the dipped beam because the lamp would blow. Clio, Polo and other's headlight can work with both dipped and high beam working at the same time, so you have more lumens when you drive during the night.
More, a single projector both for dipped and high beam is a cheap compromise between the two functions, you won't never have the best for each mode. That's why, usually, manufacturers use this solution only for small and cheap cars.
It's strange because Honda gives more performing headlights for the JDM Fit (left hand driving).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yPe_ewf9gcLED (moreorless 2500 lumens vs the 1300 of a standard halogen 55w lamp) for dipped beam and halogen for high beam, E4 omologation (Netherlands) but only japanese and australian customers can have them.